Les wrote:
To only have a single currency around the world as a stand alone proposal would be worse than what we have now. It would have to be linked with a lot of other financial dealings. Namely there would also have to be a price structure of all commodities. Then you would have to have a universal income rate. It all sounds good in theory but could not see it working in practice. As you say we would also have to have one government for the whole world to oversee that it functioned correctly. Could you imagine the size of the cabinet and we think we have enough trouble with this lot. As much as I reckon this system is up the sh** I still think it is better than some of the others.
On the contrary a global currency would stabilize currency fluctuation.
There is approximately 200 separate currencies circulating in the world today and that means billions lost on currency speculation; a single world currency would eliminate speculation, a practice that causes massive currency fluctuations, as many investors have recently discovered, without those fluctuations world prices would stabilize and probably fall, in fact it should have the effect of standardizing world prices.
In my opinion there is more to be said in favour of a single world currency than there is to be said against it; billions is made daily by currency speculators, if you’re wealthy and in a position to gamble on world currencies you can get filthy rich, eliminating that speculation makes a more even playing field. I have a friend who made a fortune buying and selling (speculating) with $US and English £’s, he lives in Sanctuary Gove and recently sold a shopping centre for $AU46 million.
